Peralta v. Heights Medical Center

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Peralta v. Heights Medical Center as edited by DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) at 17:24, July 13, 2016. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc., 485 U.S. 80 (1988), a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court held that states cannot require proof of a meritorious defense to undo a judgment if the defendant was never properly served with the complaint.

Justice Byron White wrote the decision. He held:

The Texas court held that the default judgment must stand absent a showing of a meritorious defense to the action in which judgment was entered without proper notice to appellant, a judgment that had substantial adverse consequences to appellant. By reason of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that holding is plainly infirm.