Difference between revisions of "Pseudoarchaeology"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(added information on evolution and Pseudoarchaeology)
(top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes, typos fixed: extra-terrestrial → extraterrestrial)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Pseudoarchaeology''' refers to [[archaeology]] outside of the mainstream academic archaeological community.  Pseudoarchaeological theories may include the idea that extra-terrestrial interfered in the development of humanity (such as in the book [[Chariots of the Gods?]]) or less fantastic but still not credible ideas (such as the belief that the hills of [[Bosnia]] are in fact pyramids).  A notable example of pseudoarchaeology would be the Ahnenerbe, a [[Nazi]] institution meant to prove the roots of the "Aryan race."  Evolutionists have also engaged in Pseudoarchaeology, for instance when they created the [[Piltdown Man]] hoax.
+
'''Pseudoarchaeology''' refers to [[archaeology]] outside of the mainstream academic archaeological community.  Pseudoarchaeological theories may include the idea that extraterrestrial interfered in the development of humanity (such as in the book [[Chariots of the Gods?]]) or less fantastic but still not credible ideas (such as the belief that the hills of [[Bosnia]] are in fact pyramids).  A notable example of pseudoarchaeology would be the Ahnenerbe, a [[Nazi]] institution meant to prove the roots of the "Aryan race."  Evolutionists have also engaged in Pseudoarchaeology, for instance when they created the [[Piltdown Man]] hoax.
  
 
What defines Pseudoarchaelogy would be the lack of adherence to the scientific method as well as ideological goals interfering with any findings.  As an example, the Ahnenerbe had for a goal to prove that the Aryans used to rule the world.  This as well as their lack of scientific background resulted in their arbitrary interpretations of ancient markings to pretty much mean whatever they felt like.  To this day, there has yet to be any evidence of an Aryan race ruling the world<ref>http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,747665,00.html</ref>
 
What defines Pseudoarchaelogy would be the lack of adherence to the scientific method as well as ideological goals interfering with any findings.  As an example, the Ahnenerbe had for a goal to prove that the Aryans used to rule the world.  This as well as their lack of scientific background resulted in their arbitrary interpretations of ancient markings to pretty much mean whatever they felt like.  To this day, there has yet to be any evidence of an Aryan race ruling the world<ref>http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,747665,00.html</ref>

Latest revision as of 15:12, June 24, 2016

Pseudoarchaeology refers to archaeology outside of the mainstream academic archaeological community. Pseudoarchaeological theories may include the idea that extraterrestrial interfered in the development of humanity (such as in the book Chariots of the Gods?) or less fantastic but still not credible ideas (such as the belief that the hills of Bosnia are in fact pyramids). A notable example of pseudoarchaeology would be the Ahnenerbe, a Nazi institution meant to prove the roots of the "Aryan race." Evolutionists have also engaged in Pseudoarchaeology, for instance when they created the Piltdown Man hoax.

What defines Pseudoarchaelogy would be the lack of adherence to the scientific method as well as ideological goals interfering with any findings. As an example, the Ahnenerbe had for a goal to prove that the Aryans used to rule the world. This as well as their lack of scientific background resulted in their arbitrary interpretations of ancient markings to pretty much mean whatever they felt like. To this day, there has yet to be any evidence of an Aryan race ruling the world[1]
An important characteristic of pseuodoarchaelogy is that the study of legitimate archaeological sites, but in an un-archaeological fashion. Sites such as Stonehenge, in England,[2] and Teotihuacan[3] in present-day Mexico are prone to ideologues, New Agers, and the like looking to justify their dubious theories.

See also

External links

References

  1. http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,747665,00.html
  2. http://www.vortexmaps.com/htmla/hengetor.htm
  3. Fagan, Garrett G. (2006). Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. New York: Routledge. 978-0415305938