Difference between revisions of "Scientific law"
From Conservapedia
m |
(→References) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Theory and Law | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | A scientific Law is a '''description''' based on emperical observations. A scientific law '''explains''' nothing. A Theory unifies and explains emperical observations. Thus a Law is not a refined theory and is not superior to a theory. An '''explaination''' never becomes a '''description'''; A Scientifc Theory '''NEVER''' becomes a Law. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| + | Webster's Dictionary | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Science]] | [[Category:Science]] | ||
Revision as of 21:51, August 30, 2007
A theory that has been tested by and is consistent with generations of data.[1]
Theory and Law
A scientific Law is a description based on emperical observations. A scientific law explains nothing. A Theory unifies and explains emperical observations. Thus a Law is not a refined theory and is not superior to a theory. An explaination never becomes a description; A Scientifc Theory NEVER becomes a Law.
References
Webster's Dictionary
- ↑ Wile, Dr. Jay L. Exploring Creation With General Science. Anderson: Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. 2000
