Talk:Banach-Tarski Paradox
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JacobB (Talk | contribs) at 05:53, January 5, 2010. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Since the article doesn't explain how the sphere is split, we'd better describe it as a claim made by certain parties, much as the claim made by AGW supporters that their global climate models explain or predict anything. Since GCMs have never been explained in any encyclopedia article I've read, I assume they are too esoteric for us laymen to understand (or check). --Ed Poor Talk 19:15, 4 January 2010 (EST)
- Not at all. I can have a complete description of the Banach-Tarski paradox up by tonight which will be accessible to anybody who understands irrational numbers. I'll try and have it up by tonight. JacobB 19:30, 4 January 2010 (EST)
Superb
This is superb! In reply to Ed, I agree that the statement this confirms the multiplication of the loaves is over-the-top, though funny. Thanks for deleting the comedy.--Andy Schlafly 22:53, 4 January 2010 (EST)
- Thanks, Andy! For the record, I didn't add the fish and loaves stuff, that appears to be users named Foxtrot and Aroth. JacobB 00:53, 5 January 2010 (EST)
