Once a significant amount of new information on Richard Dawkins is added to the Richard Dawkins article at Conservapedia I want to highlight the deficiencies of the Wikipedia article and show how their NPOV policy is often a policy in name only. We might even write an open letter to the atheist Mr. Wales and ask him why certain pieces of information is being left out of the Wikipedia Richard Dawkins article. Of course, that could be done with the Wikipedia atheism article as well. Since the USA and other countries have such a low estimation of atheism, it might be helpful to point out that the wiki founded by two atheist doesn't adhere to their NPOV policy when it comes to their Richard Dawkins and atheism articles. I had heard that with social media websites around the internet you can help spread a message far and wide. I certainly hope that is true. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:11, 6 May 2010 (EDT)
== Atheism/Reign of Terror ==
''Wikipedia's article on the French Revolution censors the central role atheism played in causing the mass murders of the [[Reign of Terror]].[9]''
:In defence of Wikipedia, neither does the "Reign of Terror" article here. Perhaps it's just not significant enough to mention on either site?
:Honestly, as well, there's a comment on how so-and-so, the supreme court judge, is mentioned as having the same birthday as President Jimmy Carter, while the opposite is unnoted. Going out on a limb here and I'm guessing President > Judge. Can we return to an age of reason where not everything is a sign of evil liberal bias? --[[User:Dzugavili|Dzugavili]] 19:05, 6 May 2010 (EDT)