Difference between revisions of "Talk:Honored"
From Conservapedia
(New page: This does not deserve it's own page. It should appear as a one line addition to honor. I am returning the redirect but I'll place the relevant info in the honor article. -~~~~) |
Chippeterson (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This does not deserve it's own page. It should appear as a one line addition to [[honor]]. I am returning the redirect but I'll place the relevant info in the honor article. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT) | This does not deserve it's own page. It should appear as a one line addition to [[honor]]. I am returning the redirect but I'll place the relevant info in the honor article. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I know Foxtrot, but now I loss a contribution that could help me come in first for the top three contributors. [[User:Chippeterson|Chippeterson]] September 12 2008 | ||
Revision as of 22:28, September 12, 2008
This does not deserve it's own page. It should appear as a one line addition to honor. I am returning the redirect but I'll place the relevant info in the honor article. -Foxtrot 18:24, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
I know Foxtrot, but now I loss a contribution that could help me come in first for the top three contributors. Chippeterson September 12 2008
