Difference between revisions of "Talk:Information"
From Conservapedia
(→Attribution) |
(→Attribution: Such a thing?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Perhaps we'd do better to defer this discussion until we've got a neutral description of what information theory actually states. Once we've got that down, then we could discuss its implications. Thoughts? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:45, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ::Perhaps we'd do better to defer this discussion until we've got a neutral description of what information theory actually states. Once we've got that down, then we could discuss its implications. Thoughts? [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:45, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
:::A neutral definition would be helpful. However, attribution would still be useful anyway. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 11:48, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | :::A neutral definition would be helpful. However, attribution would still be useful anyway. [[User:RDre|RDre]] 11:48, 15 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Is there such a thing as a neutral description? | ||
Revision as of 02:03, April 16, 2007
Attribution
With such a controversial topic it is essential to add proper attribution to claims. Unless you can objectively prove that information can only come into existence by intelligent means, then it is inappropriate to state something as fact. RDre 11:36, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Science does not "prove", but can succeed or fail to disprove. Can you dispute (disprove) the claim? Philip J. Rayment 11:42, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Perhaps we'd do better to defer this discussion until we've got a neutral description of what information theory actually states. Once we've got that down, then we could discuss its implications. Thoughts? Tsumetai 11:45, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- A neutral definition would be helpful. However, attribution would still be useful anyway. RDre 11:48, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Perhaps we'd do better to defer this discussion until we've got a neutral description of what information theory actually states. Once we've got that down, then we could discuss its implications. Thoughts? Tsumetai 11:45, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
- Is there such a thing as a neutral description?
