Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jonathan Pollard"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(explanation for my edits)
 
(thanks)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I removed/rewrote many edits by Fox, which were questionable.  Pollard was a traitor to the United States; this is an American-centric encyclopedia and his treason should be highlighted, not glorified.  He lied to his country, and betrayed its secrets.  The reasons behind his treason are interesting and bear discussion, but they do not constitute an excuse, and do not absolve Pollard, morally or ethically.  [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 12:07, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 
I removed/rewrote many edits by Fox, which were questionable.  Pollard was a traitor to the United States; this is an American-centric encyclopedia and his treason should be highlighted, not glorified.  He lied to his country, and betrayed its secrets.  The reasons behind his treason are interesting and bear discussion, but they do not constitute an excuse, and do not absolve Pollard, morally or ethically.  [[User:PhilScheur|PhilScheur]] 12:07, 1 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:Thank you for your thoughtful comments. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:17, 1 December 2008 (EST)

Latest revision as of 17:17, December 1, 2008

I removed/rewrote many edits by Fox, which were questionable. Pollard was a traitor to the United States; this is an American-centric encyclopedia and his treason should be highlighted, not glorified. He lied to his country, and betrayed its secrets. The reasons behind his treason are interesting and bear discussion, but they do not constitute an excuse, and do not absolve Pollard, morally or ethically. PhilScheur 12:07, 1 December 2008 (EST)

Thank you for your thoughtful comments. --Ed Poor Talk 12:17, 1 December 2008 (EST)