Difference between revisions of "Talk:Last wordism"
From Conservapedia
Underscoreb (Talk | contribs) (→So...) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::::It's not exactly encyclopaedic, either. Would anyone object to removing that particular homily? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:09, 23 November 2008 (EST) | ::::It's not exactly encyclopaedic, either. Would anyone object to removing that particular homily? [[User:Underscoreb|Underscoreb]] 23:09, 23 November 2008 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == No paradox == | ||
+ | |||
+ | There's no paradox. An observer can watch compulsive [[last wordism]] by someone else and comment on it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:22, 2 May 2009 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 22:21, June 16, 2009
Unsourced nonsense?
Where is it shown that liberals are more guilty of 'last wordism' than any other political group? This is a fallacy stated only to degrade liberals. What rubbish.--Vincentvincent 10:43, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. I have deleted that comment from the article. Humblpi 12:30, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
What qualifies as X
Where X is Last Wordism? I see the accusation thrown around at any response unfavourable to Conservatives. Is there a set criteria for the point where it stops being a response and becomes last wordism? DannyRedful 18:13, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
So...
...God used last wordism? -- JArneal 12:40, 17 November 2008 (EST)
- No, don't think so. Open the mind a bit more.--Aschlafly 12:43, 17 November 2008 (EST)
(edit conflict, this is in reply to JArneal, not Aschlafly)
- God *is* last wordism, don't you think? Seems to me, the quote Bill Cosby used for his mom... "I brought you into this world, and i can damn straight take you out of this world" would apply to God most of all, hum? Kinda hard to have a last word if you no longer exist.--JeanJacques 12:46, 17 November 2008 (EST)
- I guess so. I just thought that it was strange that the article implied that God used last wordism, considering that last wordism has a bad reputation.-- JArneal 18:55, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- It's not exactly encyclopaedic, either. Would anyone object to removing that particular homily? Underscoreb 23:09, 23 November 2008 (EST)
No paradox
There's no paradox. An observer can watch compulsive last wordism by someone else and comment on it.--Andy Schlafly 18:22, 2 May 2009 (EDT)