Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberalism and bestiality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fantastic Article: new section)
(Fantastic Article: new section)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
 
Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Fantastic Article ==
 +
 +
This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia.  However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected.  I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages.  Could it be temporarily unlocked?  -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
  
 
== Fantastic Article ==
 
== Fantastic Article ==
  
 
This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia.  However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected.  I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages.  Could it be temporarily unlocked?  -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)
 
This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia.  However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected.  I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages.  Could it be temporarily unlocked?  -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:02, September 28, 2011

Wow, it's going better and better

70 articles talking about bestiality, and 7 with bestiality in the title!

Must be the bestiality-expert encyclopedia ! Why not rename it bestialopedia ?--ARamis 19:43, 27 September 2011 (EDT)

Fantastic Article

This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia. However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected. I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages. Could it be temporarily unlocked? -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)

Fantastic Article

This is a great article and a wonderful addition to an amazing encyclopedia. However, there are several grammar / spelling errors in it, but I can't edit it because it is protected. I'd list the mistakes, but there are unfortunately too many to single out in the talk pages. Could it be temporarily unlocked? -20:02, 27 September 2011 (EDT)