If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
:I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor ''and'' be wealthy? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
::The hypocrisy is in how the limousine liberals want to redistribute wealth ''from others'' to the poor, and actually oppose policies that would help upward mobility by the poor.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:39, 22 March 2011 (EDT)
== Democrats ==