Difference between revisions of "Talk:Original sin"
From Conservapedia
(New page: I removed the reference to the fall as a 'genetic defect', which is meaningless in the context of the story of Adam and Eve and thoroughly unscientific in its use of the word 'genetic'. I ...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I removed the reference to the fall as a 'genetic defect', which is meaningless in the context of the story of Adam and Eve and thoroughly unscientific in its use of the word 'genetic'. I added two balancing interpretations of the Adam and Eve story. [[User:Britinme | + | I removed the reference to the fall as a 'genetic defect', which is meaningless in the context of the story of Adam and Eve and thoroughly unscientific in its use of the word 'genetic'. I added two balancing interpretations of the Adam and Eve story. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 23:42 30 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 03:44, March 31, 2007
I removed the reference to the fall as a 'genetic defect', which is meaningless in the context of the story of Adam and Eve and thoroughly unscientific in its use of the word 'genetic'. I added two balancing interpretations of the Adam and Eve story. Britinme 23:42 30 March 2007 (EDT)
