Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parturition"
From Conservapedia
(R&Q) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | ::::What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::::When you say "accurate to a degree" are you implying that there is incorrect information? Also please list any sections you feel are inappropriate for a family friendly encyclopedia. I am not a touchy fellow, however I do not appreciate people criticising or making suggestive comments about my work and failing to follow them through. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 07:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | :::::When you say "accurate to a degree" are you implying that there is incorrect information? Also please list any sections you feel are inappropriate for a family friendly encyclopedia. I am not a touchy fellow, however I do not appreciate people criticising or making suggestive comments about my work and failing to follow them through. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 07:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::Good grief, you have as many spikes as a hedgehog. Perhaps I should have said 'accurate to a fault' only I would then have had you demanding that I list any faults in the article. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:00, June 24, 2008
Is such graphic information family friendly? Bugler 07:07, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- What is graphic about it? NormanS 07:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Tsk. You know what I mean. Bugler 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. NormanS 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. Bugler 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- When you say "accurate to a degree" are you implying that there is incorrect information? Also please list any sections you feel are inappropriate for a family friendly encyclopedia. I am not a touchy fellow, however I do not appreciate people criticising or making suggestive comments about my work and failing to follow them through. NormanS 07:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Good grief, you have as many spikes as a hedgehog. Perhaps I should have said 'accurate to a fault' only I would then have had you demanding that I list any faults in the article. Bugler 08:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. Bugler 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. NormanS 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Tsk. You know what I mean. Bugler 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
