Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parturition"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Should'nt this be called Childbirth?)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Shouldn't this article talk about the stork? '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 08:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Shouldn't this article talk about the stork? '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 08:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Should'nt this be called Childbirth? ==
 +
 +
While this is an accurate term, the more common term people will look up is [[birth]] and considering the quality of the birth article "Birth is the time at which someone or something is born. It predominately applies to living things, but it can also apply to inanimate things, like an idea."
 +
 +
'''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 08:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Perhaps we could redirect childbirth here and place a link on [[birth]]? Given this is a more scientific article I feel it may be best to have the scientific name, but it comes down to the consensus of the site. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 08:17, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::redirecting [[Child birth]] and [[Childbirth]] to this article makes more sense --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah|Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 15:13, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 19:13, June 24, 2008

Is such graphic information family friendly? Bugler 07:07, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

What is graphic about it? NormanS 07:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Tsk. You know what I mean. Bugler 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. NormanS 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. Bugler 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
When you say "accurate to a degree" are you implying that there is incorrect information? Also please list any sections you feel are inappropriate for a family friendly encyclopedia. I am not a touchy fellow, however I do not appreciate people criticising or making suggestive comments about my work and failing to follow them through. NormanS 07:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Good grief, you have as many spikes as a hedgehog. Perhaps I should have said 'accurate to a fault' only I would then have had you demanding that I list any faults in the article. Bugler 08:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
The article looks fine to me and doesn't sound graphic-- 50 star flag.png Deborah (contributions) (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Shouldn't this article talk about the stork? ---user:DLerner--- 08:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Should'nt this be called Childbirth?

While this is an accurate term, the more common term people will look up is birth and considering the quality of the birth article "Birth is the time at which someone or something is born. It predominately applies to living things, but it can also apply to inanimate things, like an idea."

---user:DLerner--- 08:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Perhaps we could redirect childbirth here and place a link on birth? Given this is a more scientific article I feel it may be best to have the scientific name, but it comes down to the consensus of the site. NormanS 08:17, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
redirecting Child birth and Childbirth to this article makes more sense -- 50 star flag.png Deborah (contributions) (talk) 15:13, 24 June 2008 (EDT)