Talk:Parturition

Is such graphic information family friendly? Bugler 07:07, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

What is graphic about it? NormanS 07:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Tsk. You know what I mean. Bugler 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. NormanS 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. Bugler 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

When you say "accurate to a degree" are you implying that there is incorrect information? Also please list any sections you feel are inappropriate for a family friendly encyclopedia. I am not a touchy fellow, however I do not appreciate people criticising or making suggestive comments about my work and failing to follow them through. NormanS 07:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Good grief, you have as many spikes as a hedgehog. Perhaps I should have said 'accurate to a fault' only I would then have had you demanding that I list any faults in the article. Bugler 08:00, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

The article looks fine to me and doesn't sound graphic--  Deborah (contributions) (talk) 08:01, 24 June 2008 (EDT)