Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scientific law"
From Conservapedia
TempestHead (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I question the validity of this article, since there really is no such thing as scientific law. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 17:15, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | I question the validity of this article, since there really is no such thing as scientific law. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 17:15, 15 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :There are plenty of things that are considered scientific law by a very large majority. For example, the laws of thermodynamics, or the laws of pressure, etc. --[[User:TempestHead]] | ||
Revision as of 21:16, March 15, 2007
I question the validity of this article, since there really is no such thing as scientific law. ColinR 17:15, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- There are plenty of things that are considered scientific law by a very large majority. For example, the laws of thermodynamics, or the laws of pressure, etc. --User:TempestHead
