Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stephen Harper"
From Conservapedia
(answer a question about crime) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: I searched on "crime" in the entry and nothing turned up. What are you talking about?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:31, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | : I searched on "crime" in the entry and nothing turned up. What are you talking about?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:31, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| − | :: This list -- Harper's Conservative Government has largely followed his election platform of five key priorities. They are : | + | :: This list -- "Harper's Conservative Government has largely followed his election platform of five key priorities. They are : |
* Federal Accountability | * Federal Accountability | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Crime | * Crime | ||
* Child Care | * Child Care | ||
| − | * Health Care | + | * Health Care " |
| − | Since the Conservatives are in favour of the first two, it logically follows that they are, in the opinion of the author, in favour of all five. It's closer to fact to say that they are in favour of the first two and against the last three. [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 23:01, 17 August 2008 (EDT) | + | ::Since the Conservatives are in favour of the first two, it logically follows that they are, in the opinion of the author, in favour of all five. It's closer to fact to say that they are in favour of the first two and against the last three. [[User:Canuck|Canuck]] 23:01, 17 August 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 03:02, August 18, 2008
I love the characterization of the Conservatives as being for crime. I left it. Canuck 22:41, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
- I searched on "crime" in the entry and nothing turned up. What are you talking about?--Aschlafly 23:31, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
- This list -- "Harper's Conservative Government has largely followed his election platform of five key priorities. They are :
- Federal Accountability
- Tax Reform (including dropping the Canadian VAT, the GST from 7% to 5%
- Crime
- Child Care
- Health Care "
- Since the Conservatives are in favour of the first two, it logically follows that they are, in the opinion of the author, in favour of all five. It's closer to fact to say that they are in favour of the first two and against the last three. Canuck 23:01, 17 August 2008 (EDT)
