Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tyrannosaurus rex"
From Conservapedia
m |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I protected this version because it did not lack citations and gave the most information. Please discuss what should and should not remain. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 17:13, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | I protected this version because it did not lack citations and gave the most information. Please discuss what should and should not remain. --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 17:13, 17 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :One citation repeated three times is not equal to three citations. Try looking at this, careful it's gots '''bigwords''' in it. [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3790/is_200103/ai_n8932547| Gut contents from a cretaceous tyrannosaurid.] | ||
Revision as of 21:19, March 17, 2007
Again, should be titled Tyrannosaurus REX--Elamdri 18:26, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Reverts?
Why can't we include the creationist view on T. Rex? My edits keep getting reverted.
- Write your edit here to see what's wrong and cite all sources. --ALFa 16:02, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
- Can't we have some images of a t-rex eating people in a natural history museum? I think that would be a major improvement. (ha ha) Scorpionman 18:55, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
This is brilliant! Don't change a thing!--Jack 16:46, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
Protected
I protected this version because it did not lack citations and gave the most information. Please discuss what should and should not remain. --<<-David R->> 17:13, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
- One citation repeated three times is not equal to three citations. Try looking at this, careful it's gots bigwords in it. Gut contents from a cretaceous tyrannosaurid.
