Difference between revisions of "Talk:Women"
From Conservapedia
Aziraphale (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not going into the Biblical issues here; that's for more scholarly folk than myself. However: "''Also not explicitly stated in the Bible, it is obvious that,''" does that work? At what level of opinion and/or writer's logic does CP draw the line? [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 03:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | I'm not going into the Biblical issues here; that's for more scholarly folk than myself. However: "''Also not explicitly stated in the Bible, it is obvious that,''" does that work? At what level of opinion and/or writer's logic does CP draw the line? [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 03:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: NO, this does not work. The logic in that is completely flawed. | ||
| + | ::Also, if Eve was created from Adam's rib, wouldn't she be his sister? They are of the same flesh and blood... | ||
| + | ::-- [[user:Orly|Orly]] 10:24 14 March 2007 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 09:26, March 14, 2007
I'm not going into the Biblical issues here; that's for more scholarly folk than myself. However: "Also not explicitly stated in the Bible, it is obvious that," does that work? At what level of opinion and/or writer's logic does CP draw the line? Aziraphale 03:25, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- NO, this does not work. The logic in that is completely flawed.
- Also, if Eve was created from Adam's rib, wouldn't she be his sister? They are of the same flesh and blood...
- -- Orly 10:24 14 March 2007 (CET)
