Difference between revisions of "User talk:AngusT"
(Redirected page to User:Aschlafly) |
(Undo revision 858927 by RATIONxALWIKIxISxACE (talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{welcome|sig=[[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 00:48, 14 December 2009 (EST)}} | |
| + | |||
| + | AngusT, remember that the [[Conservapedia Commandments]] forbid excessive talk. Repeatedly arguing on talk pages is a blockable offense under the [[90/10 Rule]]. Please be sure you make substantive contributions as well as discussions. Thank you.--[[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 19:46, 3 January 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Editing == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please be sure you give citations and explain removal of already vetted facts. If you remove a citation, please replace it with another. --<big>[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]</big><sub>/Admin</sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 15:33, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I removed a broken link and the "facts" it supported. The site in question, even if the link worked, as for an obviously socialist group called the United States Institute for Peace. I don't think this is a reliable source by Conservapdia standards, but I could be wrong. The article as it stands basically accuses Pinochet of murdering thousands of innocent people, something communist apologetic liberals like to say but which has never been proved. The [[Pinochet]] article gives a much more accurate account than the Allende one, so it seems that one should to be edited for accuracy. In my opinion, Conservapedia shouldn't jump on the anti-Pinochet bandwagon like so many leftists in this country. I welcome your input in this area. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 16:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Lindbergh== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi. Thanks for [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Best_of_the_public&curid=104391&diff=817382&oldid=813906&rcid=900986 pointing this out] about "Lucky Lindy". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | :You're welcome. I'm a little surprised he wasn't mentioned already! [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 10:08, 16 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:21, March 25, 2011
Welcome!
Hello, AngusT, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, AngusT!
- JacobB 00:48, 14 December 2009 (EST)
AngusT, remember that the Conservapedia Commandments forbid excessive talk. Repeatedly arguing on talk pages is a blockable offense under the 90/10 Rule. Please be sure you make substantive contributions as well as discussions. Thank you.--Wuhao1911 19:46, 3 January 2010 (EST)
Editing
Please be sure you give citations and explain removal of already vetted facts. If you remove a citation, please replace it with another. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 15:33, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
- I removed a broken link and the "facts" it supported. The site in question, even if the link worked, as for an obviously socialist group called the United States Institute for Peace. I don't think this is a reliable source by Conservapdia standards, but I could be wrong. The article as it stands basically accuses Pinochet of murdering thousands of innocent people, something communist apologetic liberals like to say but which has never been proved. The Pinochet article gives a much more accurate account than the Allende one, so it seems that one should to be edited for accuracy. In my opinion, Conservapedia shouldn't jump on the anti-Pinochet bandwagon like so many leftists in this country. I welcome your input in this area. AngusT 16:26, 19 April 2010 (EDT)
Lindbergh
Hi. Thanks for pointing this out about "Lucky Lindy". --Ed Poor Talk 14:27, 15 September 2010 (EDT)
- You're welcome. I'm a little surprised he wasn't mentioned already! AngusT 10:08, 16 September 2010 (EDT)
