Difference between revisions of "User talk:BabeTruth2"
From Conservapedia
BabeTruth2 (Talk | contribs) |
BabeTruth2 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
P.S. Our [[rules]] are clear and violators are blocked.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | P.S. Our [[rules]] are clear and violators are blocked.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | :: And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? | + | :: And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? --[[User:BabeTruth2|BabeTruth2]] 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 04:58, March 22, 2007
Yes, you will be blocked again, because you are posting gossip inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Your posting is not educational in any way.--Aschlafly 00:54, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
P.S. Our rules are clear and violators are blocked.--Aschlafly 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? --BabeTruth2 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
