Difference between revisions of "User talk:Brossa"
From Conservapedia
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
How dare you insult Aschlafly and all who are contributing to his letter by restricting the dialog to "reputable" journals. By insisting on using only ''appropriate'' venues to the exclusion of other possible arenas, you demonstrate your close-minded liberal bias toward professionalism.[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 17:03, 29 July 2008 (EDT) | How dare you insult Aschlafly and all who are contributing to his letter by restricting the dialog to "reputable" journals. By insisting on using only ''appropriate'' venues to the exclusion of other possible arenas, you demonstrate your close-minded liberal bias toward professionalism.[[User:Kallium|Kallium]] 17:03, 29 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Please don't remove information from articles== | ||
| + | Please don't remove information from articles without discussing it on the talk page first. Godspeed, --[[User:Annie|Annie]] 21:58, 19 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:58, August 20, 2008
"Your insulting tone (any other "reputable" journal) discredits yourself, but I'll respond this one time to you below.--Aschlafly 22:22, 27 July 2008 (EDT)"
How dare you insult Aschlafly and all who are contributing to his letter by restricting the dialog to "reputable" journals. By insisting on using only appropriate venues to the exclusion of other possible arenas, you demonstrate your close-minded liberal bias toward professionalism.Kallium 17:03, 29 July 2008 (EDT)
Please don't remove information from articles
Please don't remove information from articles without discussing it on the talk page first. Godspeed, --Annie 21:58, 19 August 2008 (EDT)
