Difference between revisions of "User talk:Burke39"
VargasMilan (Talk | contribs) (Restriction/ Reply.) |
(→Restriction) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
It's permanent as for now. If you show good behavior as a regular contributor, you may have success in appealing that decision. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 21:34, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | It's permanent as for now. If you show good behavior as a regular contributor, you may have success in appealing that decision. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] 21:34, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Its just that I'm not sure that my contributions in that topic were any worse than in other areas. Why is that specific area being singled out? --[[User:Burke39|Burke39]] 21:44, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:44, May 12, 2015
Welcome!
Hello, Burke39, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Burke39!
- --James Wilson 15:56, 10 November 2011 (EST)
Age of consent/Pedophilia
Burke, you moved a large section from one article to another article, then said it didn't belong in the second article either. Are you going to put it somewhere else?
Rudolf Freiherr von Sebottendorff
Burke, how could the founder of a "Worker's party" be regarded as right-wing? And what offices did this "politician" hold? VargasMilan 02:34, 12 March 2015 (EDT) I took out the reference to the right-wing, and replaced "politician" with "political activist". Is that better?--Burke39 02:37, 12 March 2015 (EDT)
Restriction
You're getting another chance, but you're not allowed to edit articles or content on human sexuality. Those are Conservapedia's administration's orders. VargasMilan 21:15, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
- Ok, I understand. Is that a permanent restriction or a temporary one? I mean if I agree to change what the problems were can I edit them?--Burke39 21:17, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
It's permanent as for now. If you show good behavior as a regular contributor, you may have success in appealing that decision. VargasMilan 21:34, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
- Its just that I'm not sure that my contributions in that topic were any worse than in other areas. Why is that specific area being singled out? --Burke39 21:44, 11 May 2015 (EDT)
