Difference between revisions of "User talk:Elkman"
(Reply) |
(→Thanks: Done.) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST) | : This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]] items #8 and #13. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST) | ||
::Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". [[User:TheGuy|TheGuy]] 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST) | ::Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". [[User:TheGuy|TheGuy]] 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Sixties== | ||
| + | Sorry, you have me all wrong. By all means add the info you did but it didnt belong in that particular area. What is written is a run down of the bands of the era, not what they were up to. See what i mean? | ||
| + | [[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 00:11, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Thanks == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | : Fine. Do it. --[[User:Elkman|Elkman]] 09:26, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :: Done. You know what to do if you change your mind (and assuming your e-mail is active). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:04, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, June 17, 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Elkman, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Elkman!
- Philip J. Rayment 10:05, 1 January 2008 (EST)
Reversions
I've reverted a number of your edits, as I perceived them as being highly suspicious. The most notable one involved citing state laws and a common saying rather than scientific fact to present the view that criminals cannot be rehabilitated. Please feel free to discuss these further. TheGuy 19:03, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- This is a conservative encyclopedia. As such, character flaws and moral failings need to be pointed out as such. See Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia items #8 and #13. --Elkman 19:10, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- Yes, but making highly controversial statements that fly in the face of scientific research by relying on legislation imposed by politicians many years ago and opinion polls is akin to gossip and original research, neither of which are acceptable in any encyclopedia. If you have any proof that depression and alcoholism are moral weaknesses instead of mental illnesses, or if you have any proof that criminals cannot be rehabilitated then please present it, otherwise that bear in mine that even though Conservapedia is a "conservative encyclopedia", it is also a "trustworthy encyclopedia". TheGuy 19:30, 15 February 2008 (EST)
Sixties
Sorry, you have me all wrong. By all means add the info you did but it didnt belong in that particular area. What is written is a run down of the bands of the era, not what they were up to. See what i mean? AdenJ 00:11, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks
Thanks for the tip about protecting deleted pages. And If you want to be permanently blocked, please ask rather than provoke. We don't need an excuse to block! Philip J. Rayment 08:10, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
- Fine. Do it. --Elkman 09:26, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
- Done. You know what to do if you change your mind (and assuming your e-mail is active). Philip J. Rayment 10:04, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
