:Alright, but I still do not comprehend your block of SamHB. You could have explained your opinion on this essay on his talk page, instead of simply reverting his edits. Therefore, you were not less involved in this edit war than SamHB. In my personal opinion the actions of Pussy Riot fall under freedom of speech (which is a Conservative value that differs the USA from such Pseudo-Conservative and Soviet-nostalgic states like Russia).--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 11:59, 27 February 2018 (EST)
::Well, there is one thing about that, though - liberals have a tendency to "support" freedom of speech only when it's convenient to them. But as we've been seeing in media outlets that are not part of the liberal media, liberals are all too quick to deny freedom of speech to conservatives and frequently (and illegally) use weaponized political offices and courts to do so. By their words and actions, Pussy Riot are by no means "conservative" either, and regardless of whether their actions are covered by freedom of speech or not, they were still intended to offend a religious majority (specifically through blasphemy) and it still doesn't make it right. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 14:18, 27 February 2018 (EST)
==Copyright protection for intellectual property of the Islamic State==
So you are defending the intellectual copyright protections for intellectual property produced by the Island State. Now I understand where you're coming from. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 15:36, 9 June 2018 (EDT)