|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | ---- | | ---- |
| | | | |
| − | ==A serious Biblical matter==
| + | <br /> |
| | | | |
| − | Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:
| + | ''Taj is no longer at Conservapedia |
| − | {{cquote|"The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''"}}
| + | |
| − | [[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:
| + | |
| − | {{cquote|"The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''."}}
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself! The only "scholar" who has proposed this "theory" in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly.
| + | <br> |
| − | | + | |
| − | I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted: any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky. As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one) as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:24, 25 November 2012 (EST)
| + | |
Latest revision as of 00:01, December 14, 2013
For prior talk page conversations see archives, or click here: archive.
Taj is no longer at Conservapedia
