Difference between revisions of "User talk:WaltherPPK"
From Conservapedia
WaltherPPK (Talk | contribs) (thanks Joaquin) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: No problem - but until I can convince others that the OFFICIAL term for the Belfast Agreement has NOTHING to do with the ludicrous notion of an "anti-religious conspiracy", I'm afraid it seems I will be debating that point for quite some time yet. Thanks, though, for your understanding - I'm sure you get annoyed when foreigners perceptions of Mexico are presented as 'fact', when you know it to be wrong. [[User:WaltherPPK|WaltherPPK]] 19:22, 3 June 2008 (EDT) | ::: No problem - but until I can convince others that the OFFICIAL term for the Belfast Agreement has NOTHING to do with the ludicrous notion of an "anti-religious conspiracy", I'm afraid it seems I will be debating that point for quite some time yet. Thanks, though, for your understanding - I'm sure you get annoyed when foreigners perceptions of Mexico are presented as 'fact', when you know it to be wrong. [[User:WaltherPPK|WaltherPPK]] 19:22, 3 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This one is a fight you can't win. A good try, but the task is literally impossible. If you can prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term very concretely, then it doesn't matter because CP is an American site. If you can't prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term, then you are wrong and it is not. Rock and a hard place.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 20:00, 3 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:00, June 4, 2008
Sorry, but this site is not for talking! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 01:05, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
- Joaquin, if you look at my edit record, you'll see that I have only ended up doing all this "talking" AFTER I made an edit to an article. I often notice that you or other editors have to defend you editorial decisions after you edit an article, and that is all I'm doing. If you expect me to just roll over and let it pass when incorrect information is posted that I happen to know something about, then I'm afraid you're wrong. WaltherPPK 19:03, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
- Just remember rule 90/10. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 19:07, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
- No problem - but until I can convince others that the OFFICIAL term for the Belfast Agreement has NOTHING to do with the ludicrous notion of an "anti-religious conspiracy", I'm afraid it seems I will be debating that point for quite some time yet. Thanks, though, for your understanding - I'm sure you get annoyed when foreigners perceptions of Mexico are presented as 'fact', when you know it to be wrong. WaltherPPK 19:22, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
This one is a fight you can't win. A good try, but the task is literally impossible. If you can prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term very concretely, then it doesn't matter because CP is an American site. If you can't prove that Belfast Agreement is the more commonly used term, then you are wrong and it is not. Rock and a hard place.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 20:00, 3 June 2008 (EDT)
