Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wycliffe"
(→paragraphs) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Hi. The Calvinism paragraph seemed overly long in a long article, and it repeated some material already found on the page. But that was the only issue with me there. My changes mainly went to to either correcting grammar and making for easier reading OR replacing language that could be considered somewhat slanted with more neutral or balanced wording. I have read the guidelines and try to abibe by them all. Wycliffe. | Hi. The Calvinism paragraph seemed overly long in a long article, and it repeated some material already found on the page. But that was the only issue with me there. My changes mainly went to to either correcting grammar and making for easier reading OR replacing language that could be considered somewhat slanted with more neutral or balanced wording. I have read the guidelines and try to abibe by them all. Wycliffe. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Is it you ?== | ||
| + | Hi, welcome in Conservapedia. Be careful to not vandalize, and look [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOU8GIRUd_g this brief explanation].Ask me for any problem--[[User:Alamir|Alamir]] 09:36, 3 July 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:36, July 3, 2010
Welcome!
Hello, Wycliffe, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Wycliffe!
- Welcome to Conservapedia! Glad to see another Anglican member --IScott 11:57, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
Editing
We get far too many vandals here, so please be careful with your edit notes, and make sure if you state an edit is "minor" it is indeed minor, okay? Thanks! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 18:18, 28 June 2010 (EDT)
paragraphs
Some paragraphs have been missed in your edits. Could you please reinstall them or support your deletes? --Joaquín Martínez 19:45, 2 July 2010 (EDT)
Hi. The Calvinism paragraph seemed overly long in a long article, and it repeated some material already found on the page. But that was the only issue with me there. My changes mainly went to to either correcting grammar and making for easier reading OR replacing language that could be considered somewhat slanted with more neutral or balanced wording. I have read the guidelines and try to abibe by them all. Wycliffe.
Is it you ?
Hi, welcome in Conservapedia. Be careful to not vandalize, and look this brief explanation.Ask me for any problem--Alamir 09:36, 3 July 2010 (EDT)
