Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cremation"
From Conservapedia
(reason for reversion) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
SimonA, your edit is contrary to logic. Cremation does implicitly deny the resurrection of the body, and is promoted most by non-[[Christians]] who reject the resurrection of the body.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:56, 29 December 2007 (EST) | SimonA, your edit is contrary to logic. Cremation does implicitly deny the resurrection of the body, and is promoted most by non-[[Christians]] who reject the resurrection of the body.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:56, 29 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :But after, say, 200 years or so, under normal circumstances, a body will have decomposed entirely. There's really no practical difference, physically, between the state of the body after cremation and that after decomposition. The idea that the body would be resurrected as is is quite risible. There's no necessity in Christianity for this, either. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 23:40, 29 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:40, December 30, 2007
SimonA, your edit is contrary to logic. Cremation does implicitly deny the resurrection of the body, and is promoted most by non-Christians who reject the resurrection of the body.--Aschlafly 22:56, 29 December 2007 (EST)
- But after, say, 200 years or so, under normal circumstances, a body will have decomposed entirely. There's really no practical difference, physically, between the state of the body after cremation and that after decomposition. The idea that the body would be resurrected as is is quite risible. There's no necessity in Christianity for this, either. --SimonA 23:40, 29 December 2007 (EST)
