Last modified on August 10, 2007, at 01:01

Paul v. Davis

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 01:01, August 10, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701-02 (1976), then-Justice William Rehnquist wrote for a divided U.S. Supreme Court that "[d]amage to reputation alone is not actionable under § 1983 unless accompanied by injury to "some more tangible interests."

This holding has frequently been distinguished and questioned by lower courts.