Conservapedia:AFD NAMBLA

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Kept & Locked: 6/16/2007

--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 03:35, 16 June 2007 (EDT)


We don't need it. RobS 16:22, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

I think it could be a good article, but we should get rid of the logo as it somehow gives an air of legitimacy to pedophiles.--JoyousOne 16:26, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Wow, a completely inarticulate reason. Okay, I say we do. But wait, we can't get rid of the logo, that is their official...thing. I am not a lawyer, but I believe we have every right to use it and ought to. Flippin 16:27, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Sure, we may have the "right" to use the logo, but I'm sure they have other "official things" that we really don't need to see. We should expand the article, wikify it, and keep the link, but ditch the logo.--JoyousOne 16:28, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
I changed the logo to a thumb--does that help any? Flippin 16:30, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
Let's have a poll. RobS 16:42, 26 April 2007 (EDT)


Please vote Keep or Delete and sign.

  • Keep They're scum, but ignoring them won't make them go away. Czolgolz 16:45, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep I don't like them, but since we can't wish them into the corn or hide in the woods until the world ends, we might as well prepare people for a possible encounter. Flippin 16:46, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Merge with NARAL into new entry NAMBRAL and place in Category:Child predators. RobS 16:52, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep. RobS 21:01, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
    • Maybe you should create an article on NARAL before you want to merge something with it. Your suggestion, as is, doesn't really make much sense. --JeffersonDarcy 16:55, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
      • I'm undecided on this one; you could learn from this if we decide to keep it. Trust me, you'll think twice before creating an article of this nature before I'm done editing it. RobS 17:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep but I don't think we should merge the article with NARAL.--StapleTalk 16:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep People should be aware of them. I'm sure there are parents and children out there that have never heard of them before. DrSandstone 16:56, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep From a conservative perspective, we can use this to attack the ACLU. DanH 17:03, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep Forewarned is forearmed, let people know them for what they are --Trashbat 17:11, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep but avoid adding links to other organizations except where clearly related. That is, you would be hard-pressed to find citations linking NAMBLA with NARAL, but with the ACLU, that would not be so hard.JoyousOne 17:51, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
    • Google Pelosi+NAMBLA; 34,000 hits. RobS 17:56, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
That still doesn't make the link. It is too tenuous to say Pelosi supports gays supports NAMBLA. But if you can find a way to do it...--JoyousOne 17:59, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
"George W. Bush"+NAMBLA gets 29,000. So that's probably not sufficient evidence. Murray 18:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

My house got telemarketed by a company that claimed that Ted Kennedy supported NAMBLA because he supports the ACLU (and that we did too because our long distance service donated money to Kennedy). That's too flimsy. The ACLU connection is enough. DanH 19:15, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

Delete. Stupid people think that Evil can be reasoned with. Evil twists logic and perverts it.--Sysop-TK /MyTalk 08:52, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

Delete it, and move relevent contents to article Child molesting. Karajou 14:32, 28 April 2007 (EDT)

  • We've discovered NAMBLA's activism is not limited to gay issues. RobS 15:56, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Well, that makes me feel so much better! What about the North American MAN-BOY Love Association isn't homosexual related? --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 17:37, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
    • NAMBLA Bulletin, Editorial: War in Iraq?, March 2003. The date is particularly significant, as we see now this group provided leadership to the anti-War movement. RobS 17:42, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
  • Keep and Lock This article is useful to warn parents. Geo.Talk 17:45, 28 April 2007 (EDT)