Pendent jurisdiction
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pendent jurisdiction doctrine is as follows:
| “ | [I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to be considered under the pendent jurisdiction doctrine ... will point toward declining to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims. | ” |
Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7, 108 S. Ct. 614, 98 L. Ed. 2d 720 (1988).
Dismissal of supplemental state law claims after federal claims are dismissed are reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review.