User contributions
November 4, 2012
November 3, 2012
Christopher Hitchens
the silly comment in the caption sounds like parody. Putting it up on our website will only make people think we're a parody site and not take us seriously. Let's not fall for this
-298
You didn't build that
This site needs some serious editorial help. You have no idea how annoying it is to have to clean up after everyone else's messes
+9
Patriotism
I fail to see the point of having two periods at the end of a sentence.
-1
Hollywood values
again, no consistency whatsoever in section order -- not very encyclopedic, eh?
+1
Pope Benedict XVI
Unless something's changed in the last twenty-something hours, I believe "footnotes" go last and "also see" should be "see also." Why is there never any consistency here?
-17
Anderson Cooper
Come one, people, let's get our period placement right
Cable News Network
Well Known Bias: There's really no need to capitalize the first letter of every word in a section heading
Mainstream media
That is *not* how a cquote template's supposed to be used, people
-1
Barack Hussein Obama
This should be a *reference*. It looks unbecoming of an encyclopedia to have a link like that just sitting at the end of a sentence.
+10
Formula One
I honestly don't know why we bother putting in a "notes" heading (incorrect name, by the way -- it's "footnotes") if there are no references in the entire article
-23
November 2, 2012
Charles de Gaulle
definitely seems like a word that could use an external link -- especially when it's in the first damn paragraph of the article
+4
Vichy regime
extra spacing makes the article look a bit strange and isn't very aesthetically becoming of an encyclopedia
-1
T-34 tank
not sure why we have a "references" heading if no one's going to bother adding any references
-29
Panther Tank
could we please have the decency to add captions to pictures. This *is* an encyclopedia after all
+15
User talk:PaulDiFoglio
Disciplinary action...
+84
November 1, 2012
User talk:PaulDiFoglio
Can you dial back the sarcasm a bit?
+185
User talk:PaulDiFoglio
Can you dial back the sarcasm a bit?
+276
User talk:PaulDiFoglio
no edit summary
+526
Nazi platform of 1925
giving the reader the simple encylopedic courtesy of an introductory sentence instead of letting them dive straight into material. Also had to add {{reflist}} because the original author didn't
+73
User talk:Snowy
Undo revision 1016063 by Snowy (talk) Please do not delete important comments on talk pages. Please instead address the issue properly.
+303
Body Mass Index
again, as a trustworthy encyclopedia I think it's important we include this relevant information. Not sure why we're struggling to do that
+147
Uruguay
Economy: a plain picture looks bad an isn't very becoming of an encyclopedia
+74
User talk:Snowy
Bumblebee: new section
+303
Bumblebee
please put at least a little effort into making articles consistent in their formatting -- this is getting ridiculous
+8
Daniel Webster
because *his* name isn't in the picture, it is okay to put it in the caption. I'd like to see more consistency here
+15
Dartmouth College
again, really not that difficult
Dinesh D'Souza
don't need name in caption when it's already in the picture
-16
Affirmative Action
again, the title only needs to be bolded once in the text
-6
University of California, Los Angeles
unfairness of their love of affirmative action. Also, please remember to put a simple bullet point before each item under see also -- not that hard
+92
Theodore Kaczynski
simple grammar: in English the period goes inside the quotation marks. I'll assume the homeschooled students who write these articles haven't reached that lesson in their education yet
Al Qaeda
See also: adding former leader to see also
+20
Amoral
surprised no one had the decency to add this. It's the "Trustworthy Encyclopedia" for a reason, people.
+59
Essay: New Ordeal
adding see also, continued needed improvement
+27
Franklin D. Roosevelt
notes: trying to add at least a little bit of consistency to these articles. Again, "footnotes." Not just "notes."
+4
Agricultural Adjustment Administration
References: one column is *way* too long
Mitt Romney
2012 Presidential campaign: really not that hard
-1
Mitt Romney
Economic Agenda: periods go before the reference, not after -- not that hard
Mitt Romney
mentioning Obama's incumbency for the debate he lost
+10
Kenneth Grahame
redirect to The Wing in the Willows
Winnie the Pooh
book titles get italicized -- not that hard
+4
Electrical resistance
better like this
+10
User talk:PaulDiFoglio
An article you might want to write: re:
+88
User talk:RayfordCry
welcoming new user
October 31, 2012
User:PaulDiFoglio
no edit summary
+129
Andrew Schlafly
I believe "Conservapedia" is supposed to be italicized. People, this is your encyclopedia, at least learn to write its name properly
+4
Senate Conservatives Fund
internal link for Jim DeMint in the article's first mention of him, not a later one
Senate Elections 2012
yeah they're evil, but as an encyclopedia we should at least make the effort to capitalize their name
Burger Court
its *infamous* for Roe v. Wade, not just "famous"
+2
Supreme Court of the United States
Decisions by Term: presumably we're going to add to this small list -- this is an encyclopedia after all
+19