User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 19:23, November 30, 2008 diff hist +10 Sean Hannity Added "allegedly" in reference to birthplace (see article on Obama)
- 01:55, May 14, 2008 diff hist +1 m The New York Times missing period
- 01:54, May 14, 2008 diff hist +35 The New York Times edited grammar; added {{fact}} template
- 20:38, June 29, 2007 diff hist +1,833 Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Added reply
- 03:50, June 29, 2007 diff hist +1,707 Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Added reply
- 02:13, June 29, 2007 diff hist +12 m Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally?
- 02:13, June 29, 2007 diff hist +74 m Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally?
- 02:11, June 29, 2007 diff hist +426 Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Added response
- 02:04, June 29, 2007 diff hist +136 Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Undo revision 211977 by Special:Contributions/Aschlafly (User talk:Aschlafly) (No reason to delete Futsunushi's entry)
- 23:39, June 28, 2007 diff hist +49 m Talk:Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Added signature.
- 23:39, June 28, 2007 diff hist +104 Talk:Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Added response
- 19:49, June 28, 2007 diff hist +217 New! User:Trend Created page current
- 19:43, June 28, 2007 diff hist +77 Conservapedia:Debate Topics →Religious debates
- 19:43, June 28, 2007 diff hist +146 New! Debate:Should the first story of creation be read allegorically or literally? Created topic