Page history
April 9, 2019
June 27, 2016
January 20, 2015
November 9, 2014
January 20, 2012
January 19, 2012
June 30, 2010
March 1, 2010
December 29, 2009
September 22, 2009
January 4, 2009
copy edit, flow
m+60
add cia ref for warning leaflets
+166
correcting statement regarding leaflets, as per TK's reference
+45
adding working citation, that is correct, not revisionist
+101
Reverted edits by JessicaT (Talk) to last version by RSchlafly
m-458
January 3, 2009
update on warning of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and ref
+458
Several other countries now also have atomic bombs, Manhattan was related
+60
General gramatical fixes and rewording for flow.
m+12
June 24, 2008
June 23, 2008
April 17, 2008
Reverted edits by Giovanni33 (Talk); changed back to last version by Karajou
m-10,212
why the revert?
+10,212
Reverted edits by Giovanni33 (Talk); changed back to last version by BenHur
m-10,212
this is minority view, a revisionist take on the bombings, but interesting, well referenced.
+10,212
August 28, 2007
August 27, 2007
no edit summary
+25
VJ Day was not VE Day, it wasn't the related to WWII in Europe or elsewhere.
+20
the moral debate is not based primarily on the loss of civilian life; there were other losses that are not similarly debated
+44
62 years isn't new
-42
August 26, 2007
August 25, 2007
June 6, 2007
April 6, 2007
March 21, 2007
March 13, 2007
March 11, 2007
December 27, 2006
no edit summary
+98
Mention the ethical/moral dimension
+352
State the facts without speculating on the United States' possible reasons
-56
no edit summary
+353
Original motivation was fear of possible German A-bomb, not "way to end World War II"
+173