Page history
July 13, 2016
February 16, 2009
February 9, 2009
February 8, 2009
February 5, 2009
Removing incorrect statement. The Long line without endpoints is a counterexample to the claim.
-288
precision in defintion
m+18
relate to Axiom of Choice
+89
missing phrase
+22
Undo revision 619638 by AndyJM (Talk) rvv, with intention of fixing statement
+269
Removing incorrect statement. Please see my proof that this is incorrect on the talk page.
-269
January 28, 2009
Undo revision 615409 by ArnoldFriend (Talk) didn't see the link to linear order above
-4
no edit summary
+4
January 16, 2009
November 27, 2008
no edit summary
+408
The statement removed is not true. One could add a number at either end of the real line, define the order in the obvious way and one would still have a continuum.
-271
There is no such thing as a continuous set. Link given is to continuous function.
-130
Corrected: As stated the article assumes the truth of the continuum hypothesis while discussing it a conjecture!
-7
November 22, 2008
Undo revision 566258 by MatthewP REVERT VANDALISM
-1,683
OMG CONSERVAPEDIA, HEIL CONSERVAPEDIA! PEWPEWLAZ0RZ!
+1,683