Page history
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
May 30, 2020
December 12, 2019
October 26, 2019
September 25, 2019
May 27, 2018
January 5, 2018
November 14, 2017
November 13, 2017
October 24, 2017
October 12, 2017
August 26, 2016
July 13, 2016
March 21, 2014
February 13, 2012
February 10, 2012
June 3, 2010
May 3, 2010
April 28, 2010
April 18, 2010
April 17, 2010
November 5, 2009
August 13, 2009
December 26, 2008
December 17, 2008
no explanation of why it's perjorative - despite a comment by Able
-616
no edit summary
mIt is pseudoscience, unless there is a well-understood way that it →could: be falsified
+27
It is the belief that natural selection in combination with random mutation is the directive or creative force of evolution - now how might we falsify this?
-3
who says it's perjorative?
+13
December 1, 2008
November 20, 2008
November 19, 2008
October 12, 2008
October 7, 2008
April 17, 2008
no edit summary
+514
Reverted edits by Cdesign (Talk); changed back to last version by Humblpi
m-133
no edit summary
+133
April 8, 2008
"neo-darwinism" isn't really in common use
+4
The modern theory of evolution based on Darwin's idea is called "Neo-Darwinism" or more formally "neo-Darwinian synthesis".
+138