Page history

DavidB4-bot

→‎Jzyehoshua's Arguments for Creationism: HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.thedailybeast.com → https://www.thedailybeast.com

DavidB4-bot

HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.nytimes.com → https://www.nytimes.com (2), http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org, http://www.britannica.com → https://www.britannica.com

JZambrano

→‎Jzyehoshua's Arguments for Creationism

JZambrano

→‎Jzyehoshua's Arguments for Creationism

JZambrano

no edit summary

Gosweden

→‎Accusations against creationism and creationists

AddisonDM

no edit summary

JessicaT

Discussion:Creationist moved to Debate:Creationist

Kmcheng

→‎What a creationist is not

Qwestor

no edit summary

Philip J. Rayment

I'm happy with the term.

Philip J. Rayment

→‎But, but, but...!: unsigned and reply re Miller Urey experiment

Philip J. Rayment

→‎But, but, but...!: unsigned and reply re speciation.

Philip J. Rayment

→‎But, but, but...!: unsigned and reply re polystrate fossils

Philip J. Rayment

→‎But, but, but...!: unsigned and reply

Philip J. Rayment

→‎References: Mark end of post

Philip J. Rayment

→‎Prior discussion: Clarify for later readers, but I do think this would be better on a separate page.

SSchultz

→‎But, but, but...!: - Response

JakeC

Hm...?

SusanIvanova

no edit summary

Aschlafly

3 points

TerryH

→‎"..."

JakeC

→‎"..."

JakeC

no edit summary

JakeC

"..."

TerryH

→‎References

TerryH

→‎References

TerryH

New discussion

JakeC

Well, they have to call them something...

Aschlafly

reply

Qwestor

no edit summary

Qwestor

no edit summary

Aschlafly

a start