Page history
April 11, 2022
April 9, 2019
April 2, 2019
September 26, 2018
September 24, 2016
July 13, 2016
July 12, 2016
June 22, 2013
June 21, 2013
October 12, 2012
September 14, 2011
no edit summary
+596
updated a link
-16
revert deletions of information - discuss on talk page before deleting info
+753
→Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
m+2
→Side Effects and Adverse Reactions: --Vaccines do not cause autism. The science is pretty clear on this.
m-15
→Effectiveness: --Concept of lymphocyte memory in adaptive immunity. Antibody titre is likely to remain high enough to protect against infection for several decades.
-318
again, prevalence of active infection was misrepresented as lifetime incidence
-353
no edit summary
+414
The paper renferenced reports prevalence of active infection, not lifetime incidence.
-483
September 9, 2011
May 3, 2011
April 6, 2011
March 13, 2011
August 31, 2010
April 18, 2010
August 22, 2009
no edit summary
m-4
no edit summary
mHPV vaccine researcher declares, "Public Should Receive More Complete Warnings"
+753
June 17, 2009
→Effectiveness: National Cancer Institute does not claim 100% effectiveness.
-4
→Effectiveness: Article shouldn't be an opinion piece. (Plus one can say that deaths after HPV vaccine is not related - correlation does not imply causation)
-46
→Side Effects and Adverse Reactions: Changed link to primary source from CDC
m-34
→Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
-21
Cited reference does not mention death.
-10
March 18, 2009
March 13, 2009
February 11, 2009
February 9, 2009
January 14, 2009
Reverted edits by DinsdaleP (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
m+183
Removed this reference to a supposed association, since the reference itself states that there is no association
-183
January 13, 2009
Reverted edits by AndyJM (Talk) to last version by Aschlafly
m-148
Adding point about tranmission during childbirth - see Andy Schlafly's comments on the talk page.
+148
Reverted edits by JWalker (Talk) to last version by Foxtrot
m-9
clearing up meaning of "abstinence" per talk page
m+9
January 11, 2009
Undo revision 607518 by TheGuy (Talk) nonsense
+109
Abstinence does not provide 100% protection against HPV, as I have already explained
-109
January 10, 2009
Reverted edits by TheGuy (Talk) to last version by J00ni
m+261
Abstinence is not 100% safe in this case, as a bride could be infected by husband
-109
Clearly states that gardasil was not linked in that case
-152