Page history
December 28, 2018
July 20, 2016
November 25, 2015
June 3, 2013
August 20, 2012
Undo revision 1001150 by Tobouycha (talk)
-9,048
Rewrote the article to read correctly. Umad, Conservapedia? :3
+9,048
July 8, 2012
July 6, 2012
June 18, 2012
June 15, 2012
whoops! clicked "revert" by accident. Anyway, see talk page for explanation of this edit.
-81
Reverted edits by CPalmer (talk) to last revision by CWest
m+81
→Wikipedia's role: removing misunderstanding - see talk page for explanation
-81
June 5, 2012
April 30, 2012
expanding on the Pharisees - perhaps the most important historical parallel to the h. s.
+1,070
→Wikipedia's role: I have been surprised by the vehemence of this
+192
April 29, 2012
no edit summary
m+7
when confronted with the logic and even miracles performed by Jesus, disbelievers insisted that Jesus cite "authorities" for his truths. Imagine listening to the Prodigal Son and then asking
+272
April 24, 2012
April 23, 2012
and if a reference is found, then the statements are considered truth regardless of whether the reference consists of unreliable hearsay
+142
In the hearsay society the use of hearsay is so rampant that participants can lose the ability to recognize the difference between what is hearsay, and what is not.
+170
degradation of reference quality
+833