Page history
July 13, 2016
October 30, 2008
September 30, 2008
April 23, 2008
December 31, 2007
November 4, 2007
More information on the opposing view; improve reference
+237
→Information is conveyed by symbols: Add quote from Gitt.
+692
September 1, 2007
July 25, 2007
July 14, 2007
→Levels of information: Grammar (mine!)
m-2
→Origin of information: Remove; info deriving from electronic sources have an intelligent designer as the ultimate source; info arising from biological sources is begging the question.
-434
→Bibliography: Add Dembski
+151
→Law of Conservation of Information: Correct statement
+48
added legal meaning
+251
May 25, 2007
→Origin of information: spelling, attribute, further
+524
→Information and creation
+158
→Measuring information: Shorten footnote
-108
→Bibliography: Just list Lamb's part, but add date
-62
→Bibliography: Correct authorship
+39
→Origin of information: Oops
m-14
Measuring information
+855
April 15, 2007
Here's one ref.
+103
Revert. Do evolutionists qualify all their claims with "which evolution scientists contest"? However, if you can find an opposing view, that can be mentioned also.
-30
add more generalist attribution.
m+30
Revert; I've now added another source.
-80
→Origin of information: Specify and add source
+68
Adding attribution, as per style guide
+80
This is the summary. I've now put a reference in the discussion of that point later in the article.
-8
→Origin of information: Add reference for information coming from an intelligence
+153
cite?
m+12
New article, but unfortunately it's a bit sparse.
+4,999