Page history
April 9, 2019
April 3, 2019
September 26, 2018
July 25, 2016
July 12, 2016
October 9, 2011
May 10, 2010
May 1, 2010
April 20, 2010
July 18, 2009
September 22, 2008
September 21, 2008
August 12, 2008
July 28, 2008
July 2, 2008
June 18, 2008
May 30, 2008
May 9, 2008
April 11, 2008
March 20, 2008
March 18, 2008
March 17, 2008
Undo revision 407671 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) I will continue to revert until you actually back up what you say with this thing called 'evidence'.
+25
Undo revision 407627 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - rv without comment
-25
Undo revision 407537 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) See Talk - the evidence is NOT in the provided link. As you are well aware.
+25
Undo revision 407483 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - The proof is the link provided. Stop edit-warring based on nothing but your say-so.
-25
Undo revision 406680 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) If this is what you claim, PROVIDE EVIDENCE, JINX!!!!!!!!!
+25
March 16, 2008
March 15, 2008
March 13, 2008
Protected "Left Behind: Eternal Forces": edit warring [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
mUndo revision 404103 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) reverting erroneous revert. SEE TALK, JINX!!!
+25
March 12, 2008
March 11, 2008
See Talk, Jinx
+25
Undo revision 403165 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - You are applying a definition to "fully patched" which is not provable and is not supported by anything.
+42
You're misunderstanding what 'fully patched' means - see Talk
-42
Undo revision 403160 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - rv. No misreading at all. It clearly states "Eternal Forces" is now "fully patched."
+42
Reverting edit done due to complete misreading and/or misunderstanding of cited source
-42
→Reviews: - Referenced review refers to the fact that the version included in "Tribulation Forces" (which is the same version as the updated original game) is "fully patched."
+42
March 10, 2008
March 9, 2008
→Reviews
+188
As per DanH, re-doing my edit
+24
→Reviews
+6
Reverted edits by Urushnor (Talk); changed back to last version by DanH
m-24
Undo revision 401515 by Special:Contributions/DanH (User talk:DanH) Try actually reading the reviews and comparing that with the patchnotes. Jinxmchue's statement is simply untrue.
+24
Reverted edits by Urushnor (Talk); changed back to last version by Jinxmchue
m-24
Undo revision 401509 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) As I have said, the 'dozens of issues' were not raised by the complaints in the reviews. See your talk page.
+24
Undo revision 401464 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - this edit is factual, unbiased and makes no judgment about how many issues were or weren't addressed
-24
Undo revision 401454 by Special:Contributions/Jinxmchue (User talk:Jinxmchue) Why should I 'give it up'? Your edit is factually inaccurate.
+24
Undo revision 401445 by Special:Contributions/Urushnor (User talk:Urushnor) - Give it up already.
-24
Still not getting it right - the patches fix dozens of issues, but not all were raised by the complaints in the reviews
+24