Page history
August 3, 2025
→Mark's Identity
+76
→Mark's Identity
+341
→Mark's Identity
-7
no edit summary
-7
→Traditional Misinformation about Mark
+92
January 26, 2025
no edit summary
+4
See also {{bibleref|Mark|4|10}}: "And when he was alone, ''those present'' along with the Twelve questioned him about the parables."
+209
December 12, 2024
July 2, 2024
June 29, 2024
June 27, 2024
June 9, 2024
December 18, 2023
May 16, 2023
May 14, 2023
April 2, 2023
May 1, 2022
April 17, 2022
April 10, 2022
February 19, 2022
January 22, 2022
January 16, 2022
→First Pope of Alexandria
m+2
→Mark's Identity: Alexandria
+32
→Traditional Misinformation about Mark
m-1
Although his concise gospel was plainly written by an outsider, there have been strained attempts to fit Mark into the group.
+194
improved - almost certainly a Gentile
-79
→Mark's Identity
m+5
→Mark's Identity: an outsider
+27
→Mark's Identity: Also, his opening sentence would have been blasphemy punishable by death under Jewish law, proclaiming (unlike the other Gospels) that his work is "the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God."
+249
January 10, 2022
January 9, 2022
Mark may have been a Gentile, as he describes without precision Jewish customs in his Gospel. Mark was always an outsider with respect to the Apostles, and was not invited into their group after the Resurrection or when a new 12th Apostle was
+435
no edit summary
+3
Given Mark's eyewitness account of the visit to Jesus's tomb, it is possible he was the son of either Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, or Salome.
+249
January 2, 2022
no edit summary
m+2
Mark was probably also the boy mentioned at John 6:8-9
+261
no edit summary
+3
Mark's description of Jesus walking on water is from the perspective of watching it from the shore, where someone too young to be with the Apostles in the boat would have been.
+434
May 15, 2017
February 9, 2017
Reverted edits by BleachMyButt (talk) to last revision by DavidB4-bot
m+2,774
#REDIRECT User:BleachMyButt
-2,774
July 12, 2016
November 15, 2015
The original Gospel of Mark lacks any account of Jesus's background or the Resurrection, neither of which the non-Apostle Mark would have known anything about.
+174
Though placed second in the New Testament due to its incompleteness, the Gospel of Mark was probably the first Gospel written, perhaps without initial authorization by the Apostles.
+163
June 12, 2013
Reverted edits by FinlandiA (talk) to last revision by Chippeterson
m+2,465
Replaced content with "man"
-2,465