Page history
November 1, 2014
March 2, 2014
no edit summary
+58
no edit summary
+506
no edit summary
+9
no edit summary
+26
no edit summary
-3
no edit summary
+70
no edit summary
no edit summary
no edit summary
+4
no edit summary
+4
no edit summary
no edit summary
+411
no edit summary
-24
no edit summary
+121
Protected "Quote mining" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
mReverted edits by GregG (talk) to last revision by Conservative
m+320
March 1, 2014
+a sentence
+92
restore my lede; after careful consideration, it is superior to the present lede
-409
better wording
-3
January 30, 2014
June 9, 2013
no edit summary
-21
fix typo
-14
typo
m+2
Protected "Quote mining" ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
mno edit summary
+412
June 8, 2013
April 24, 2013
better explanation, with hopefully a helpful distinction between citation as a scientific practice and appeal to authority/quote mining
+163
2nd try at a rewrite
-323
April 23, 2013
Reverted edits by GregG (talk) to last revision by Stephenp
m+523
remove paragraph that ignores the difference between science and law and politics and is a bad argument (words of scientists are not evidence in science)
-523
August 18, 2010
June 29, 2009
Reverted edits by MichelF (Talk) to last version by Conservative
m+9,618
Blanked the page
-9,618
→Intelligent Design Journalist Denyse O'Leary on False Charges of Quote Mining By Evolutionists
-16
→Intelligent Design Journalist Denyse O'Leary on False Charges of Quote Mining
+14
→Intelligent Design Journalist Denyse O'Leary on False Charges of Quote Mining
+2
→Intelligent Design Journalist Denyse O'Leary on False Charges of Quote Mining
+11
→Intelligent Design Journalist Denyse O'Leary on False Charges of Quote Mining by Evolutionists
-16
no edit summary
+1,116
January 9, 2009
December 18, 2008
→See also
m+38
separated dogma objection to the typical evolutionist anti-scientific objection
+1
the charge of "quote mining" reflects an objection to quoting someone for criticizing his own belief system
m+16
falsifiability: no amount of evidence in favor of a scientific theory has merit if even a single counterexample can be found
+1,115