Page history

Jpatt

Reverted edits by Aspartame (talk) to last revision by CasparRH

Aspartame

Important mistake - fixed for clarity.

CasparRH

no edit summary

AlexM74

→‎==Examples

AlexM74

Example- Russel's Teapot

Tzoran

no edit summary

AngusF

add missing letter

JessicaT

Undo revision 621484 by Jlensher (Talk)Direct copy from elsewhere - the "fun:celestial teapot" gave you away.

Jlensher

no edit summary

Philip J. Rayment

Revert; edit was copied from Wikipedia

Jlensher

no edit summary

Jlensher

Russel's Teapot

Philip J. Rayment

Revert; addition basically claimed that if the rebuttal was valid, the fallacy does not apply, and therefore the rebuttal is invalid!!

Jhan

Fallacy is misleading, the rebuttal would completely change the original argument so that any conclusion is irrelevant.

Interiot

it may be fallacious, and it may heavily rely on a logical fallacy, but it itself isn't a "logical falacy" (in the idiomatic sense), and it doesn't fit in with any other member of the category

Aschlafly

Reverted edits by ScottForschler (Talk); changed back to last version by DanH

ScottForschler

no edit summary

ScottForschler

correction

DanH

Russel's teapot moved to Russell's teapot:

Deborah

no edit summary

HelpJazz

wikilink

HelpJazz

capitalization

Philip J. Rayment

Expand, pointing out the fallacy of the argument

Gulik5

mispeeelingz

Gulik5

New page: '''Russel's Teapot'' is an Argument first formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell as a reducto ad absurdiam of the notion that in an argument about the possible exis...