Page history
December 30, 2020
January 1, 2020
→Decision
+188
→Decision
+193
→My vote is Matt Gaetz
+472
→My vote is Matt Gaetz: Reply
+509
→My vote is Matt Gaetz
+318
→My vote is Matt Gaetz: new section
+471
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+586
December 31, 2019
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+1,460
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+929
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+1,204
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+1,631
→Need top pick the winner and first runner-up
+332
time's up! My vote
+253
December 29, 2019
December 28, 2019
→Tucker Carlson: insert missing "of" into my own comment, for clarity
m+3
→Boris Johnson
+548
→Boris Johnson
m→Boris Johnson
+2,227
→Tucker Carlson: I agree: Tucker should go higher, but I don't think the others should. All them are essentially talking to an elderly, set-in-their-ways demographic.
+247
December 27, 2019
→Jair Bolsonaro
+275
→Tucker Carlson: new section
+2,558
→Jair Bolsonaro: new section
+1,382
→Tulsi Gabbard
+780
December 26, 2019
→Tulsi Gabbard: Valid point, but Gabbard has been more effective in 2019 in espousing certain conservative positions with swing voters than the several of the media types on the list have been.
+274
→Tulsi Gabbard: new section
+547
December 17, 2019
→Boris Johnson
+206
→Boris Johnson: You make a valid point, and he won't be the Conservative of the Year here. In general, British politicians are typically not conservative by American standards.
+271
→Boris Johnson
+83
→Boris Johnson
+6
→Boris Johnson
+304