Page history

Conservative

no edit summary

Conservative

→‎See also

Conservative

→‎See also

Conservative

→‎See also

JohnTheRevelator

John von Neumann's Game Theory arguably falls under naturalistic science, as human behavior is generally natural. Lumping von Neumann in with Marx seems a bit insulting to such a brilliant man.

DavidB4-bot

→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://books.google.com → https://books.google.com

DavidB4-bot

→‎top: Spelling, grammar, and general fixes

DavidB4-bot

→‎See also: clean up

JoeyJ

→‎References

AK

adding category

AK

Adding text from Hedtke

Brenden

Undo revision 1002555 by QDibbins (talk)

QDibbins

Whoops! More grammatical errors.

GregG

reword lead, expand the other usage of theory

Jpatt

Reverted edits by JHuns (talk) to last revision by Ed Poor

JHuns

no edit summary

Ed Poor

Reverted edits by QJohns (talk) to last revision by MaxFletcher

QJohns

no edit summary

MaxFletcher

fix red link

RSchlafly

add evolution as context for quote

Ed Poor

redundant, sorry

Ed Poor

A model or framework (made up of a body of principles) to explain phenomena

Philip J. Rayment

Copyedits, formatting, etc.

Ed Poor

A theory is a metascientific elaboration, distinct from the results of observation but consistent with them

Kazumaru

→‎Scientific Theory: Removed Engrish.

Aziraphale

categorize

Philip J. Rayment

target renamed (and this is better terminology anyway)

RSchlafly

rm plagiarized and inaccurate distinction

TheGentleman

no edit summary

Ed Poor

physical science does not encompass all science, and we cannot say the number theory is outside of science - is math "unscientific"?

Ed Poor

Everyone wants to know whether a given "theory" is "scientific" or not.

Ed Poor

if something is said to be “just a theory,” it usually means that it is a mere guess, or is unproved. It might even lack credibility.

Ed Poor

starting over

Ed Poor

Theory moved to Scientific theory