Page history

RobSmith

→‎The scandal breaks: wiki

RobSmith

→‎What is a reputable source?

DavidB4-bot

HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.nationalreview.com → https://www.nationalreview.com, http://web.archive.org → https://web.archive.org (2), http://www.pbs.org → https://www.pbs.org, http://www.linkedin.com → https://www.linkedin.com, htt...

DavidB4-bot

→‎The scandal breaks: HTTP --> HTTPS #2, replaced: http://www.bbc.co.uk → https://www.bbc.co.uk, http://www.telegraph.co.uk → https://www.telegraph.co.uk

DavidB4-bot

Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: Brandt’s → Brandt's (5)

RobSmith

no edit summary

DavidB4-bot

HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://en.wikipedia.org → https://en.wikipedia.org (64), http://www.usatoday.com → https://www.usatoday.com, http://www.cnsnews.com → https://www.cnsnews.com

DavidB4-bot

Spelling/Grammar Check, typos fixed: prominant → prominent, self promotion → self-promotion

DavidB4-bot

clean up

DavidB4-bot

clean up & uniformity

Michaeldsuarez

Linking.

Michaeldsuarez

The domain name is back. Giving WR references id's.

Michaeldsuarez

The domain name "wikipediareview.com" has expired.

MrDavies

Update to Berlets' status on Wikipedia

RobSmith

context

RobSmith

TOC

RobSmith

start new article