| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | Specifically, a modern feminist denies or downplays differences between men and women, opposes the encouragement of homemaking and child-rearing for women, and seeks to participate in predominantly male activities, possibly including sexual intercourse with women. Most modern feminists: | | Specifically, a modern feminist denies or downplays differences between men and women, opposes the encouragement of homemaking and child-rearing for women, and seeks to participate in predominantly male activities, possibly including sexual intercourse with women. Most modern feminists: |
| | | | |
| − | * never wanted gender equality; they want power for the female left<ref> [http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2011/feb11/11-02-11.html Phyllis Schlafly, "Feminism Has Become a Hot Topic"]</ref> | + | * want gender equality; including power for the female left<ref> [http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2011/feb11/11-02-11.html Phyllis Schlafly, "Feminism Has Become a Hot Topic"]</ref> |
| − | * in movies, portray the men as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality) | + | * in movies, sometimes portray the men as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women as inherently good, smart or competent |
| − | * pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances [[liberal]] causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., [[VAWA]] funding of women's groups) | + | * pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances [[liberal]] causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., [[VAWA]] funding of women's groups) |
| − | * oppose [[chivalry]] and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes) | + | * oppose [[chivalry]] and sometimes feign insult at harmless displays of it |
| − | * view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably patriarchal | + | * sometimes view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably patriarchal |
| − | * belittle and mock other women who desire to have children or raise a family<ref>http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/03261992.html</ref><ref> "Being a [[housewife]] is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of [[radical feminism]] is to change that." - Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, "The Daily Illini," April 25, 1981. [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/You_Don_t_Know_Feminism_744100744.shtml "You Don't Know Feminism"] </ref> | + | * may not be involved in traditional gender activities, like baking<ref>"But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough." [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]</ref> |
| − | * shirk traditional gender activities, like baking<ref>"But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough." [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]</ref>
| |
| | * support [[affirmative action]] for women | | * support [[affirmative action]] for women |
| − | * prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do<ref>"[T]he wearing of pantsuits is often a useful feminism signifier, depending on the culture of the law firm." [http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2640]</ref><ref>"I was part of a growing tribe of pesky women called feminists by friends and enemies alike. We women stormed out the door in our imitation men's suits ...." [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]</ref>
| |
| | * seek [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines | | * seek [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines |
| − | * refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying<ref>"(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller. http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2003/10/16/names/index.html]</ref> | + | * may refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying<ref>"(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller.http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2003/10/16/names/index.html]</ref> Note that many scientists do this in general so as to continue their name recognition in their field. This is accepted as completely normal. |
| − | * believe marriage implies female servitude when it is in fact a mutual bond | + | * believe marriage may imply female servitude |
| − | * distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (Eg: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.) | + | * distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events |
| − | * often condemn the God-Given order of gender roles, as laid out in the Holy [[Bible]] | + | * often condemn the societally precribed order of gender roles |
| − | * object to being addressed as "ma'am," or feminine nicknames such as "sweetheart" or "honey";<ref>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-talk-boxer-maamjun19,0,5804401.story</ref> object to other female-only names, such as "temptress"
| + | * take offense at using the pronoun "he" when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person as opposed to being more general |
| − | * take offense at grammatical rules of the English language, like using the pronoun "he" when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.' | |
| − | * support of the [[homosexual agenda]]
| |
| | | | |
| | ==History== | | ==History== |