Changes

::*The second example can be attributed to cultural norms in Muslim countries.  Where sharia law is practiced, women are marginalized.  Thus, any man, Muslim, Christian, Jew, whoever, would take special considerations before bringing his wife to a country hostile to women.  Under the same logic of this argument, my refusal to take friends into sketchy parts of the city where gangs reign would indicate that I am a gangster.  Again, this argument is of little probative value.

::*The second example can be attributed to cultural norms in Muslim countries.  Where sharia law is practiced, women are marginalized.  Thus, any man, Muslim, Christian, Jew, whoever, would take special considerations before bringing his wife to a country hostile to women.  Under the same logic of this argument, my refusal to take friends into sketchy parts of the city where gangs reign would indicate that I am a gangster.  Again, this argument is of little probative value.

::The issue I have is that when you have several weak examples, they make the rest of the examples look less strong in comparison.  I know that, as a lawyer, you want to not only cover all the potential arguments of a case but also focus on your strongest arguments.  I would respectfully suggest the same approach here, and I am willing to help with this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 00:18, 26 April 2012 (EDT)

::The issue I have is that when you have several weak examples, they make the rest of the examples look less strong in comparison.  I know that, as a lawyer, you want to not only cover all the potential arguments of a case but also focus on your strongest arguments.  I would respectfully suggest the same approach here, and I am willing to help with this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 00:18, 26 April 2012 (EDT)